we speak one language—
To foreign nationals facing deportation or removal from the United States, for any reason, Marshal E. Hyman and Associates, P.C., offers the ability to carefully analyze their cases and apply their unique circumstances to the complex laws, regulations, and precedents governing immigration decisions. Our attorneys possess the knowledge, experience and technology necessary to carefully and precisely determine the proper path to remain in the United States. We have successfully represented hundreds of clients in immigration offices, immigration courts, and federal courts of appeal.
We also assist those who must leave the United States with the consular processing of their visas and the filing of applications for waivers of grounds of inadmissibility.
We take pride in our reputation as the “go to” law firm for those who want to try to stay in the United States.
Lawful permanent resident status, symbolized by the so-called “green card,” allows foreign nationals to work and live in the United States without time limitations. There are several bases for obtaining lawful permanent resident status. We represent clients seeking to obtain lawful permanent residence status through
Many United States citizens and lawful permanent residents wish to bring their family members to the United States. The immigration laws of the United States allow certain family members of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents to immigrate to the United States and obtain their “green card.” Our firm has many years of experience representing
Preparation of family-based immigrant visas involves the gathering of substantial documentation and each case presents its own unique challenges. Issues such as proving relationships, processing times, immigrant quotas, age requirements, affidavits of support, and the protections afforded by the enactment of the Child Status Protection Act can be confusing to those unfamiliar with the many intricacies of the immigration laws and regulations. With over 35 years of combined experience, our attorneys can help resolve these and other issues that may arise during the processing of family-based immigrant visas.
Marshal E. Hyman and Associates, P.C., has worked successfully with many individuals seeking to obtain lawful permanent residence through employment in the United States. Our firm has many years of experience representing
In most cases involving employment-based immigrant visas, the employer must first apply to the United States Department of Labor for its certification that qualified United States workers have been recruited for the position and are unavailable. Our firm has the expertise to guide potential employers through this labor certification process. We also advise potential employers on their anti-discrimination obligations under federal immigration laws.
Most foreign nationals wishing to come to the United States temporarily—whether to work, go to school, attend a conference, or simply visit the country, family, and/or friends—must first obtain a non-immigrant visa that would allow them to travel to a United States port of entry and request permission from the Department of Homeland Security to enter the country for a specific period of stay.
Once in the United States, the length of time that non-immigrants can stay depends on the type of visa (status) under which they were admitted. Several types of non-immigrant visas allow foreign nationals to extend their status and their stay in the United States. Foreign nationals holding non-immigrant visas often desire to change their status in order to prolong their stay in the United States or perform a different activity.
The application processes for non-immigrant visas, and for extensions and changes of status, are complex and may be confusing to those unfamiliar with their many intricate nuances. Our firm has many years of experience advising foreign nationals on the types of non-immigrant visas best suited to their particular needs. Our firm can assist those wishing to extend or change their status. In certain cases, we can also obtain legal status and work authorization for dependent family members of non-immigrants.
Marshal E. Hyman and Associates, P.C., has assisted foreign nationals procure non-immigrant visas under the following categories:
Canadians, except for E-1 and E-2 investors, as well as citizens of countries designated under the Visa Waiver Program do not need non-immigrant visas to enter the United States. Please contact us if you require further information regarding non-immigrant visas.
Our firm has assisted persons from all over the world apply and receive United States citizenship through the naturalization process. Our services include counseling on satisfying all the technical requirements for naturalization, processing of the application, and attendance at naturalization interviews.
Marshal E. Hyman & Associates actively pursues federal litigation in the Supreme Court, the Circuit Courts of Appeal, and the District Courts. In the Supreme Court and the Courts of Appeal, the firm litigates asylum applications, issues involving noncitizens convicted of crimes, and applications for immigration benefits such as adjustment of status, cancellation of removal, and 212(c) relief. In the District Courts, the firms litigates issues involving delayed or denied applications for naturalization and adjustment of status and other immigration benefits, and petitions for writ of habeas corpus challenging prolonged detention in immigration custody.
Zhang v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 313 (6th Cir. 2007). Rejected BIA precedent decision in Matter of Shanu, 23 I. & N. Dec. 754 (BIA 2005) and held that a noncitizen can only have one first date of admission for purposes of determining removability under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(i).
Badwan v. Gonzales, 494 F.3d 566 (6th Cir. 2007). Overturned BIA decision denying motion for continuance, thereby allowing noncitizen to apply for lawful permanent residency.
Matovski v. Gonzales, 494 F.3d 722 (6th Cir. 2007). Rejected BIA precedent decision in Matter of Perez Vargas, 23 I. & N. Dec. 829 (BIA 2005). Resulted in noncitizens being allowed to apply for lawful permanent residency in removal proceedings based on the job flexibility provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1154(j).
Pickering v. Gonzales, 465 F.3d 263 (6th Cir. 2006). Overturned precedential BIA decision and terminated proceedings based on setting aside of noncitizen’s conviction.
Macotaj v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 464 (6th Cir. 2005). The Sixth Circuit has the authority to retroactively stay voluntary departure to the date of the filing of a motion for stay of removal.
Liti v. Gonzales, 411 F.3d 611 ((6th Cir. 2005). Remand for consideration of whether applicant is eligible for humanitarian asylum.
Buletini v. INS, 860 F. Supp. 1222 (E.D. Mich. 1994). Overturned INS’s denial of visa petition for a physician of “extraordinary ability.”
Probert v. INS, 954 F.2d 1253 (6th Cir. 1992) and 750 F. Supp. 252 (E.D. Mich. 1990). Ordered release of noncitizen based on issuance of Judicial Recommendation Against Deportation.
State v. Martinez, 105 Wash. App. 775 (Wash. App. 2001). Overturned conviction based on violation of confrontation clause when a confidential informant failed to testify in court. Also overturned conviction for insufficient evidence where only admissible evidence was defendant’s mere presence at a prearranged drug buy.
State v. Mendoza-Lopez, 105 Wash. App. 382 (Wash App. 2001). Overturned three year old conviction where defendant did not waive his right to a juvenile declination hearing.